Comments on: A Ron Paul Vote For Romney

By: warren

warren — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:47:42 +0000

Johnson does not care about the Fed. He only started talking about it after he started trying to peel people away from the Ron Paul movement. Johnson is really a Republican who wants to smoke pot. Nothing more. And his campaign is infected with GOP establishment insiders trying to damage the Ron Paul and Tea Party movements.

By: Arthur Gabriele

Arthur Gabriele — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 02:43:25 +0000

As Robin Koerner put it: Why would we want to vote for a bank-funded, Patriot Act-supporting, NDAA-supporting, interventionist who doesn’t have a plan to reduce government spending in the foreseeable future. The way I see it, Ron Paul was our last chance. Now it’s over. The debt has now out paced the GDP. We don’t have 4 more years! As we have seen, the corruption runs deep. They stole the election from RP. It doesn’t work! At this point, the only chance that I could see is that we vote in more Senators to block the house. Although Gary Johnson is a weak version of RP, he still has is gun trained at the beast (FRB). He would return the Glass Steagall Act, etc. If a write in vote for RP would count I would do that. But the big problem is that if the GOP is not behind him, there’s not enough funding to back him. If there’s a miracle, we need it now!

By: Warren

Warren — Sun, 02 Sep 2012 01:40:16 +0000

That’s why my heart tells me to write in Ron Paul. And I don’t see where my heart beats to the Republican drum.

By: Stephen VanDyke

Stephen VanDyke — Sat, 01 Sep 2012 23:03:19 +0000

There’s definitely an argument to be made that by putting Romney or the loyal opposition in office during a re-election year it would speed up the kneejerk reactionary element that still has Bush Jr’s infamy still relatively fresh in their memories.

But I’m not going to make that argument.

Instead I’m going to once again reiterate to everyone here and that you can only waste your vote with the uninformed masses when you buy into such blatantly political motives. Instead, stick to the principle of only casting your vote (and support) for those principled candidates who best represents Constitutionally limited government (not executive fiat).

I’m disappointed that Mr. Redlich would continue to play the Libertarian tune when it’s so clear his heart beats to the Republican drum.

Well, I said my spiel.

By: warren

warren — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:12:02 +0000

No Brian, I do not know that. "You didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen." That does not sound like I get credit for building my businesses. It sounds like someone else gets the credit. Obama gets credit for a crappy economy. He didn't build that either. But he sure didn't make it better. He said he should be held accountable, and that if things didn't get better in 3 years, it'd be a one-term proposition. I'm holding him accountable.

By: Brian

Brian — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 17:43:53 +0000

Warren, I am sure you know Obama was not saying you don’t deserve credit for your businesses but that you had government help. You did not build the internet, the government did and your internet company probably would not exist otherwise.

By: Lew Winegardner

Lew Winegardner — Thu, 30 Aug 2012 02:21:03 +0000

Is there any mathmatical possibility of a Johnson election? I’m still GOP, and for change from within, but Romney scares the crap outa me too. Libertarian Gary Johnson will be on the ticket but needs some points to get into the debates. Can we help make that happen so everyone gets a clear view of what is offered from that forum?

By: warren

warren — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:39:46 +0000

Right Steve – I’m a dedicated Republican who ran as the LP candidate for Governor of NY in 2010, hammering the GOP candidate in the televised debate. And I’m a statist who advocates getting rid of as much of the state as possible.

You got any substance there Stevie boy?

By: Steve LaBianca

Steve LaBianca — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:35:22 +0000

What’s to be disappointed in? Mr. Redlich is a dedicated Republican. For such folks, statism not liberty, rules the day.

By: James Glenn

James Glenn — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:15:49 +0000

You don’t see a difference between Romney and Obama on foreign policy? I do. I see Romney and Ryan as both having itchy trigger fingers, particularly when it comes to Iran. If an attack on Iran doesn’t happen prior to the election, it will definitely happen in the first 3 months of a Romney presidency. I’m not defending Obama as he’s the worst president my country has ever seen, but when it comes to foreign policy, I’m afraid it actually could be worse.